The Wall Street Journal reports that the federal government is pushing tech suppliers and contractors to cut costs and is looking to buy more off-the-shelf products direct.
The Wall Street Journal reports that the Trump administration is pushing federal agencies and suppliers to cut IT spending by eliminating channel partners from technology sales and services wherever possible — a move that could reshape the public-sector channel.
Since President Donald Trump returned to office earlier this year, his administration has made curbing government spending, particularly through contractors and outsourced services, a priority. According to the Journal, the General Services Administration (GSA) has directed key technology suppliers to identify cost reductions in existing contracts. Federal agencies are also being instructed to bypass resellers, distributors, and integrators in favor of direct procurement, under the mantra of “cutting out the middlemen.”
Federal IT service budgets have already been reduced over the past five months as agencies are encouraged to rely on internal IT staff for integration, project management, and support services. The administration’s position suggests that channel partners drive unnecessary costs, arguing that federal IT organizations are capable of handling many functions in-house.
The revenue impact remains unclear. The federal government spends nearly $90 billion annually on technology goods and services, much of which flows through a highly structured channel ecosystem that includes major distributors such as Carahsoft and Iron Bow, global vendors like Dell, HP, Cisco, and Microsoft, and hundreds of specialized public-sector integrators.
Unlike commercial sales, public-sector procurement is governed by strict regulations. Channel partners must hold GSA contracts — licenses to sell but not guarantees of revenue — and list their products on authorized supplier schedules while offering the government the most favorable pricing. Procurement policies also mandate inclusion of small businesses and diverse-owned firms, requiring large resellers to subcontract portions of their contracts to meet these obligations.
The public-sector channel is both lucrative and highly specialized, but the rules of engagement differ significantly from those in commercial sales. Traditional sales and marketing tactics such as client entertainment and incentive-driven events are prohibited. Vendors and partners must navigate a rigid compliance landscape, avoiding even the appearance of impropriety.
While controlling government spending is a reasonable objective, eliminating the channel could introduce unintended consequences. Direct procurement may deliver modest savings — often measured in single-digit percentage points — but risks overwhelming agency IT teams that may lack the capacity to independently adopt, integrate, and support complex solutions without external assistance.
The broader concern is the economic ripple effect. Many public-sector resellers are exclusively focused on federal, state, and local contracts. Displacing the channel puts thousands of highly skilled jobs at risk nationwide. Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the largest public-sector consultancies, has already announced plans to cut 2,500 positions as federal budgets tighten.
For vendors and channel leaders, the administration’s policy shift underscores the need to adapt public sector strategies. Vendors should:
-
Identify private-sector opportunities to help public-sector partners offset lost revenue.
-
Equip partners with value demonstration tools that articulate their critical role in delivering outcomes to government agencies.
-
Invest in new contracting vehicles and engagement models that align with federal priorities for direct procurement and value-based purchasing.
The Trump administration’s cost-cutting efforts may achieve short-term savings, but the long-term viability of the public-sector technology ecosystem depends on preserving the specialized expertise, capacity, and economic contribution that channel partners deliver. As federal procurement models evolve, vendors and partners will need to stay agile to protect their position in this critical market segment.
