Why Harp on Managed Services Model Basics?

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  

Managed services is a well-established model for the delivery of technology support through scalable resources that result in consistent recurring revenue. So why do we keep talking about the mechanics and benefits of the approach? Acceptance doesn’t mean operationalization.

Last week I gave a keynote at the GFI MAX partner conference about the mechanics and evolution of the managed services sales model. Today, my colleague Chris Gonsalves is in London to deliver the same presentation. He asked the somewhat rhetorical question: "If these guys are already MSPs, shouldn’t they get this? Why do we have to explain it to them?"

The answer is simple: Just because solution providers have implemented managed services as part of their business model doesn’t mean they’ve operationalized it. In many cases, solution providers are undervaluing managed services as a revenue driver and mistaking the initial success in recurring revenue as good enough.

Related articles

Over the last decade, managed services has become pervasive in the channel. More than 70 percent of solution providers offer some form of managed services to their customers. And managed services, according to 2112’s research, produces the highest sustained margins (profit) of the five major channel offerings -- hardware, software, professional, cloud and managed services.

Here’s why we -- 2112 and the industry at large -- continue to revisit managed services basics: It’s not that the model isn’t defined, it’s just not used to its optimal potential.

Technology is important to managed services, for certain. But sales and customer relations are more important. The three elements to achieving true success in managed services is the continual addition of new accounts, continual horizontal sales in existing accounts, and maintaining a low customer attrition rate.

Let’s start with customer acquisition. If a solution provider earns an average $1,000 per month of managed services delivered and has 50 active customers, the annual revenue is $600,000. The importance of continual account acquisition is a matter of compounding revenue. Every 10 new customers increases revenue by 20 percent.

Let’s skip to account retention, another important factor in generating and maintaining revenue. If a solution provider is losing customers faster than it’s adding them, it won’t grow. But the problem is actually worse than it appears. The managed services magic is about predictability. If an MSP has no confidence in the loyalty of its existing customers, it will have no predictability in how much revenue will accrue over the mid- and long-term measures.

Growth isn’t just a matter of adding new accounts; it’s also possible through horizontal sales – or the selling of more products and services that increases recurring revenue per account. Even if a solution provider doesn’t add new accounts, but expands the existing yield per account by 20 percent, it will have the same net-effect of adding 10 new customers.

Which of these factors is most important? All of them. The prevailing experience, though, is most solution providers stop selling when they feel they’ve reached a critical mass in their capacity. Or, worse, they perceive a low rate of customer acquisition or account expansion as good. Neither is true.

Managed services is evolving rapidly. Savvy solution providers are expanding the types of technologies they offer as a service, providing more automation services, building platforms for application delivery and, in some cases, becoming business process outsources (BPOs). They’re evolving because they generate enough cash through strong sales models to reinvest in their business capabilities.

Consider this: Solution providers tell 2112 that an acceptable annual growth rate is 26 percent. In 2012, the actual rate of growth was 17.2 percent. But most solution providers grew between 11 and 15 percent. Is 11 percent or 17 percent growth bad? On the surface, any growth is good. The real question is how much growth previous success enables a solution provider to undertake.

The reality is few solution providers are throwing off enough cash to invest in real growth. Research by 2112 shows that 85 percent of the channel pays for routine operations out of cash flow. Ninety percent of solution providers say they’re paying for growth through the same cash flow. To put this in concrete terms, a $1 million solution provider that grows 10 percent goes to $1.1 million – a net gain of $100,000 before taxes and other obligations. After the bills are paid, the effective net is closer to $50,000. If the overall business is running effect net margins of 40 percent, the net profit for the year is $440,000.

Now this sounds like a lot of money, but it’s not. Rarely does all that cash come in and sit in the bank account at any one time. And solution providers must contend with annual inflation impact – salary increases, health care costs, infrastructure replacement, license renewals, real estate expenses and, of course, taxes. The reality of revenue ebbs and flows is there isn’t necessarily a lot of cash on hand for net-new investments.

They only way to ensure viability is to grow the managed services business faster than the rest of market. This means a managed service provider must make account acquisition, horizontal sales and customer retention a top priority to ensure revenues remain consistent and compounding. This is why we and many others in the channel continue to harp on the basics of the managed services model.

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  
More on Channel Business
data-quality

Value over volume, RackWare says of expanded channel partner program

Aim is to have the right coverage with close relationships, VP says

divorce-pa

The velvet divorce? Options and disruptions to come from HP split

News that Hewlett-Packard is breaking into two companies continues to reverberate through the channel. While the ultimate impact on HP partners and customers remains unclear, the new entities will have plenty of options for plying their futures

treasure-chest-with-gold-coins

Channel strikes gold selling to non-techies

Tech sales staff busy selling to business units as much as tech staff, according to Gartner

jessica-m-225x300

Welcome to the new Channelnomics

Channelnomics goes live with new-look site. Join us on Twitter to give us your thoughts - @channelnomics

Visitor comments
Add comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
In-depth
Broken heart

An amicable split?

Where will HP and Symantec's conclusion that the sum of their parts is greater than the whole leave partners?

elvis67878787

Suspicious minds in the post-Snowden world

Investment in new technologies being avoided with security experts wary of cloud and new technologies post-Snowden

Old-fashioned cash register

Vendors need to get with the times, Channel conference hears

MSPs need up-to-date support from vendors, including working together

seo-checklist

‘Internet of Things’ shifting IT spending priorities

Analyst firm Gartner says enterprises spent more than $40 billion on what could be called Internet of Things (IoT) programs. As more IP-enabled devices get connected, enterprises may shift spending patterns and disrupt the way IT is acquired and supported