Flashback: How Microsoft Windows 1.0 Was Sold

Before it was a household name and built the world’s largest channel, Microsoft sent its best pitchman -- Steve Ballmer -- to television to hock its revolutionary new product, Windows 1.0. Here’s a flashback to the commercial that started it all.

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  

BallmerHere's a little Friday Flashback fun to end your week. Long before Microsoft Corp. released Windows 8 or built the world’s largest channel, there was Microsoft Windows 1.0. And how did Microsoft take this revolutionary operating system to market in the mid-1980s? Television commercials featuring their top pitchman of the day, Steve Ballmer.

Related articles

Yes, Virginia, the energetic and excitable Ballmer took to the airwaves in 1986 wearing his best suit and narrow tie to entice 8088 PC users to order via mail Microsoft’s first GUI operating system that “integrates Lotus 1-2-3 with Miami Vice.”

Why was Ballmer on the airwaves and not Microsoft's emblematic founder, Bill Gates? Back then, Gates wasn't that well known and was still more of a behind-the-scenes guy. Ballmer, who joined Microsoft in 1980 as the 30th employee, was the company's first real business manager. He was the one driving Microsoft's expansion, and therefore the perfect choice as pitchman, we suspect.

Microsoft’s sales model and channels have come a long way since the days when you sent a $99 via snail-mail for a handful of floppy disks. Even as Microsoft preps Window 8.1 with a boatload of enhancements and new features, it’s fun to see what the software giant considered “revolutionary” back when "Night Court," "Moonlighting" and "LA Law" ruled the airwaves (and, yes, they were still broadcast over the airwaves).

Ballmer, in his trademark dynamism, perfectly explained all the applications that came with Windows 1.0, including Reversi. Other applications included Windows Write, Windows Paint, Calendar, Card File, Control Panel, RAM Driver and a Clock.

“Can you believe it?” as Ballmer exclaimed.

And like any good infomercial pitchman, Ballmer built the value based on price. Was it worth $500 or $1,000? No. It was all $99. Now, if that seems like a bargain, consider that adjusted for inflation, the cost of Windows 1.0 in 2013 would be approximately $211. That's still cheap considering the average PC cost between $1,500 and $2,500 in the mid-80s (or as much as $5,000 in today's dollars).

Yes, Microsoft has come a long way since Window 1.0. It even sells software in Nebraska now (still trying to figure that one out).

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  

Want more articles like this?

 
More on Channel Business
newspapers

Today's channel rundown -12 February 2016

Daily tech news and analysis to know now, including CenturyLink's channel plans, Autotask's FileSync channel program, FBI's alleged hacker's arrest and more

newspapers

Today's channel rundown - 11 February 2016

Daily tech news and analysis to know now, including Avnet’s VMware partnership, CSC’s hiring spree, Qualcomm’s ultra-speedy mobile chip and more

kim-king-progress

Why VARs choose the wrong vendors

With the wrong vendor come various pitfalls for solution providers, says Progress Software's Kim King

newspapers

Today's channel rundown - 10 February 2016

Daily tech news and analysis to know now, including the IRS’s hack block, Cato’s new channel chief, Oculus’ first VR PCs and more

Visitor comments
Add comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
In-depth
paul-zeiter-zerto

Vendor Q&A Series: Paul Zeiter, Zerto

The latest channel exec to sit in the new-look Channelnomics hotseat is Zerto's president

newspapers-and-glasses

Channelnomics' top five stories of the week - 12 February 2016

Check out which articles grabbed the most attention this week

hundred-dollars

PSA pricing isn’t the big ill of managed services

Kaseya bought PSA vendor Vorex, saying the incumbent platforms are too expensive for too little benefit. Pricing isn’t as much of a problem as effective use of these systems and lack of business fundamentals

kim-king-progress

Why VARs choose the wrong vendors

With the wrong vendor come various pitfalls for solution providers, says Progress Software's Kim King