Falling Short of Software Licenses in Virtual World

Businesses using certain virtualization technology could need up to six times as many licenses as they think they do, according to software asset management (SAM) vendor License Dashboard.

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  

Editor’s note:  As part of our special editorial partnership, Channelnomics is publishing this recent article from CRN in the UK.

Businesses using certain virtualization technology could need up to six times as many licenses as they think they do, according to research by software asset management (SAM) vendor License Dashboard Ltd.

Related articles

The firm warns that companies using virtualized environments can leave themselves open to hefty non-compliance fines following confusion between device and user-based licensing.

It claims that most software licenses still operate on a device-based system, meaning every instance of the software on each virtual machine (VM) must be licensed.

Matt Fisher, director of License Dashboard, said licensing virtualized environments is still a grey area.

"Under virtualization, organizations operate many instances of a software program on a single physical machine. With the traditional device-centric software licenses that are the mainstay of most organizations today, such as Microsoft Corp. Office and Windows licenses, the organization is required to license each virtual machine separately," he added.

"While many vendors, including Microsoft, have added user-centric elements to their licensing terms, since the license remains at its core a device one, licensing under virtualization remains a grey area."

According to the firm's research, some 87 percent of its customers who responded to its survey claimed that virtualization is factored into their SAM strategy, but 20 percent said they have no system in place at all.

More than two thirds of organizations asked had at least one software audit in 2012, while 16 percent said they had three or more.

The vendor pinpoints VMware's Distributed Resources Scheduler (DRS) product as one piece of software which continues to catch people out, claiming that it has the potential to increase an organization’s server licensing requirements by up to 500 per cent at the flick of a switch.

Fisher added: "DRS can... lead to a significant shortfall in an organization’s licensing compliance, since an application has the potential to be used on every virtual machine if the need arises."

For more UK channel coverage from CRN, visit www.channelweb.co.uk

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  
More on Channel Business
marketing-plan

Fortinet partner calls for improved marketing to secure more customers

VAR says missed opportunities result when Fortinet isn't at the forefront of end user research

call-centre-india-bpo

Cloud bringing BPaaS opportunities

NetSuite and partner talk ways channel partners can capitalize in changing BPO market

women-venture-capital-arrow

Arrow CEO points to 'comprehensive' solutions as driver for Q2 results

Distributors announces financial results, increase in sales

shutterstock-180806804-china-social-media

Microsoft Chinese partner of the year Pactera talks penetrating Chinese market

China-based provider explains obstacles in succeeding in China, why market should matter to channel

Visitor comments
Add comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
In-depth
newspapers-and-glasses

Channelnomics' top five stories of the week - 31 July 2015

Check out which articles grabbed the most attention this week

Cloud computing graphic

Is pay-as-you-go the future for cloud?

Utility model may be the way forward

jessica-m-225x300

Editor's voice: The week's channel chatter - 31 July 2015

What's been happening this week on Channelnomics?

100m-starting-line

Alibaba gunning to overtake Amazon, Microsoft in the cloud

China’s online retail giant Alibaba plans to invest $1 billion to globalize its Aliyun cloud infrastructure division, with the intent of overtaking Amazon Web Services, Microsoft and IBM