Eventually, Most Companies Become a Twinkie

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  

The Twinkie, the sponge cake loved by generations of Americans, is destined for oblivion as Hostess Brands opts to shut down. The demise of this iconic brand reminds that no company is guaranteed success or viability in perpetuity; being the exception requires evolving thinking -- particularly in technology.

Chances are the Twinkie, the iconic sponge cake enjoyed by generations of Americans, hasn't seen its last day. Someone, somewhere will pick up the snack cake brand and revive its presence in the market even as Hostess Brands goes out of business.

Earlier this week, attempts to mediate a settlement between Hostess and its unions to avert a company shutdown failed. Neither management nor the unions would yield concessions, forcing the debt-laden baker to seek bankruptcy protection and liquidation.

Related articles

Set aside the allegations of greed and the inflexibility of both management and workers, and focus on the viability of a company: Hostess was already in trouble when the contract negotiations soured. Increasingly health-conscious consumers have been shifting their snacks to low-calorie, low-fat alternatives for years. The sugary, high-calorie, low-nutrition Twinkies and their cousins simply are no longer a part of the palate.

The real lesson here is that most companies will eventually meet their viability limits because of changing market dynamics, costs and an inability (or unwillingness) to change. This is particularly true in the technology space, which continues to see a number of companies teeter on the edge of oblivion because they’re facing the Twinkie dilemma.

Consider Hewlett-Packard Co., which has written off nearly $17 billion this year alone related to the bad acquisitions of EDS and Autonomy. Following the dot-com bust in the early 2000s, HP took on a hyper-growth posture with the goal of becoming the world’s largest technology company. It bought Compaq in a merger that eliminated an iconic PC brand that most people thought had sustained viability. It went on to spend on Mercury Interactive, 3Com, Opsware, 3Par, ArcSight and dozens of other companies.

Despite nearly $30 billion spent on acquisitions in the past five years alone, HP is openly seen as facing the same fate as the Twinkie. Some Silicon Valley whispers about HP not surviving the next five years have erupted into loud disdain. Some are calling for the company to break up into smaller components, so the more viable divisions could survive the looming crash.

The same is being said of Microsoft Corp. While no one is predicting the imminent demise of Redmond, Wash.-based giant, many people say the software maker is losing its market dominance and relevancy at an alarming rate. Sales of Windows 8, the latest iteration of its flagship operating system franchise, have been less than stellar. Microsoft’s Surface, its entry into tablets, is bringing it into conflict with OEM partners. And Microsoft continues to struggle to find its footing in the cloud and services market. Some analysts predict Microsoft could go the way of Novell, which suffered a slow and agonizing decline to become a subsidiary of Attachmate.

HP isn’t alone in facing the Twinkie dilemma. Every company must make choices to maintain relevancy or arrive at the ultimate destination. Some companies will evolve to meet changing markets, just as IBM has over the last 125 years, from making industrial scales to becoming the world’s largest enterprise technology company. The magic of IBM is that it continues to evolve and produce steady growth despite the size of its sprawling global operation. Evidence of IBM’s choices: its 2005 divesture of PCs to Lenovo, in which it got out of the notebook business to focus on enterprise systems.

Compaq is a great example of management recognizing the need to punch out. Rather than investing in its future and evolving to a new state of competitiveness, Compaq took HP’s $25 billion offer and folded into a larger organization. The merger is widely cited as one of the worst deals ever, despite propelling HP to become the global PC leader.

The number of technology companies -- vendors, distributors and solution providers -- greater than 50 years old is slim. The exclusive club is reserved for those who have made choices to evolve, change their value propositions and accept periodic setbacks. As Twinkie demonstrates and HP may soon reinforce, the only guarantee in business is the failure to make choices and adapt will result in those choices being made for you.

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  
More on Channel Business
money-wad-dollar

IDC predicts 21 percent increase in 2015 cloud infrastructure spending

Research firm expects U.S. to see fourth largest growth globally

Men shaking hands

Fewer deals, smarter sales

What appears illogical on the surface — lower sales volume, higher profitability — makes perfect sense when you think about it

seo-question

Lenovo: People don't know enough about our channel business

Vendor opens enterprise briefing center aimed at increasing customer engagement

Boxing glove

Fight IT commoditization with differentiation that matters - partner

Clients care more about money and efficiency than IT jargon, an MSP says

Visitor comments
Add comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
In-depth
The cost of doing business

MSP Consortium free RMM, PSA tools should ease MSP business costs

The Managed Service Provider Consortium is giving away a new remote monitoring and management and professional services organization tool to enable solution providers to operate free of costly licensing fees

mobile-iot

‘Things’ take center stage

Vendors, VARs, and start-ups feed off rapidly growing momentum of the IoT movement

Men shaking hands

Fewer deals, smarter sales

What appears illogical on the surface — lower sales volume, higher profitability — makes perfect sense when you think about it

marc-dupaquier-photoshop1

Vendor Q&A Series: Marc Dupaquier, IBM

The latest channel exec to sit in the Channelnomics hotseat is IBM's general manager of global business partners