Chinese Official Lashes Out at Huawei Critics

The furor over allegations of Chinese industrial espionage and national security threats reached the highest levels of the Beijing government Saturday when China's commerce minister took time away from his nation’s 18th Communist Party Congress to deride U.S. criticism of technology firms like Huawei and ZTE.

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  

[caption id="attachment_18171" align="alignright" width="281"]China Commerce Minister Chen Deming China Commerce Minister Chen Deming[/caption]

The furor over allegations of Chinese industrial espionage and national security threats reached the highest levels of the Beijing government Saturday when China's commerce minister took time away from his nation’s 18th Communist Party Congress to deride U.S. criticism of technology firms like Huawei Technologies Co. and ZTE Corp.

Related articles

Commerce Minister and Communist Party member Chen Deming chastised U.S. critics, saying their complaint “smacks a little of Cold War mentality.” Deming said the United States was entering dangerous territory by attempting to blacklist Huawei, the world’s second-largest telecom equipment maker, because of its alleged relationship with the ruling communists.

"The U.S. raised the security issue of Huawei and ZTE to the level where they are asking whether the companies have Communist Party cells and what their relations are with the party,”  Deming told a group of reporters during a break in the Congress, being held to organize new leadership for the Asian country of 1.3 billion people.  “Can you imagine if China started asking U.S. companies coming to China what their relationship was with the Democratic or Republican parties? It would be a mess. Personally I think this has gone too far.

"If you see me as a Trojan horse, how should I view you?” Deming asked. “By this logic, if the Americans turned it around, they would see that it's not in their interest to think this way."

Deming’s comments mirror a dismissive statement his organization released last month aimed squarely at eth U.S. House intelligence committee’s report.

"This report by the relevant committee of the U.S. Congress, based on subjective suspicions, no solid foundation and on the grounds of national security, has made groundless accusations against China," commerce ministry spokesman Shen Danyang said at the time.

The dustup was kicked off in early October when Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the powerful House Select Committee on Intelligence, appeared on CBS’s 60 Minutes to warn the U.S. market of what lawmakers perceived as the Huawei threat.

“If I were an American company today… and you are looking at Huawei, I would find another vendor if you care about your intellectual property, if you care about your consumers’ privacy, and you care about the national security of the United States of America,” Rogers said.

The House admonition was followed with reports that the Obama administration had led its own security review of Huawei equipment and business practices and found no evidence of espionage or deliberate cybersecurity threats or practices that would undermine the national security of the United States, Reuters news service reported. The White House has since denied it authorized any such report and disavowed the conclusion that Huawei had been exonerated.

The damage was done, however. A poll conducted by Channelnomics and The 2112 Group after the House report was made public found that U.S. solution providers overwhelmingly felt the U.S. assertions against Huawei would dampen sales and marketability of the company’s products, and they would be less likely to work with companies labeled as a national security threat.

European countries, meanwhile, continue to embrace Huawei, with officials in the U.K. in mid-October announcing the vendor’s $2 billion investment in a new regional headquarters and the plans to expand in the British Isles. And indeed there are dozens of foreign technology companies who supply the underpinnings of critical infrastructure with whom U.S. companies and the U.S. government have no problem at all.

William Plummer, vice president for external affairs at Huawei in Washington, told Channelnomics the House report was a “political distraction” and that the intelligence committee “seems focused on the acts of other states.

“To the extent that there are issues between states, they should be managed through appropriate diplomatic or other channels, not by holding hostage an independent, world-respected and trusted company,” Plummer said.

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  
More on Channel Business
king-queen-crown

Synergy Research: Domination by cloud's big four isn't going to change

Research firm says AWS, Microsoft, IBM, Google will keep topping smaller cloud providers

tap-on-cloud-crowdfund

Analyst: Selling cloud solutions not enough to tap into SMBs

TechAisle CEO talks up need for consulting, SMB outsourcing trends

Uber ride request

Uber's fight speaks volumes

Not everybody is thrilled with the rise of the so-called ‘gig economy', but it's probably change that's getting under people's skin

trading-panic-race

Fortinet looking to catch up with competition in mid-market

Execs say marketing, channel will help

Visitor comments
Add comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
In-depth
rob-herjavec1

Star turn: MSP boss and reality TV regular talks up security

Robert Herjavec, Founder of MSP Herjavec Group and Dancing with the Stars star, warns cybersecurity is 'really a global problem'

Uber ride request

Uber's fight speaks volumes

Not everybody is thrilled with the rise of the so-called ‘gig economy', but it's probably change that's getting under people's skin

waynenewtonbelkin

Vendor Q&A Series: Wayne Newton, Belkin

The latest channel exec to sit in the Channelnomics hotseat is Belkin's (Belkin, Linksys and WeMo) director of channel sales in North America

newspapers-and-glasses

Channelnomics' top five stories of the week - 24 July 2015

Check out which articles grabbed the most attention this week