Chinese Official Lashes Out at Huawei Critics

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  

The furor over allegations of Chinese industrial espionage and national security threats reached the highest levels of the Beijing government Saturday when China's commerce minister took time away from his nation’s 18th Communist Party Congress to deride U.S. criticism of technology firms like Huawei and ZTE.

[caption id="attachment_18171" align="alignright" width="281"]China Commerce Minister Chen Deming China Commerce Minister Chen Deming[/caption]

The furor over allegations of Chinese industrial espionage and national security threats reached the highest levels of the Beijing government Saturday when China's commerce minister took time away from his nation’s 18th Communist Party Congress to deride U.S. criticism of technology firms like Huawei Technologies Co. and ZTE Corp.

Related articles

Commerce Minister and Communist Party member Chen Deming chastised U.S. critics, saying their complaint “smacks a little of Cold War mentality.” Deming said the United States was entering dangerous territory by attempting to blacklist Huawei, the world’s second-largest telecom equipment maker, because of its alleged relationship with the ruling communists.

"The U.S. raised the security issue of Huawei and ZTE to the level where they are asking whether the companies have Communist Party cells and what their relations are with the party,”  Deming told a group of reporters during a break in the Congress, being held to organize new leadership for the Asian country of 1.3 billion people.  “Can you imagine if China started asking U.S. companies coming to China what their relationship was with the Democratic or Republican parties? It would be a mess. Personally I think this has gone too far.

"If you see me as a Trojan horse, how should I view you?” Deming asked. “By this logic, if the Americans turned it around, they would see that it's not in their interest to think this way."

Deming’s comments mirror a dismissive statement his organization released last month aimed squarely at eth U.S. House intelligence committee’s report.

"This report by the relevant committee of the U.S. Congress, based on subjective suspicions, no solid foundation and on the grounds of national security, has made groundless accusations against China," commerce ministry spokesman Shen Danyang said at the time.

The dustup was kicked off in early October when Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the powerful House Select Committee on Intelligence, appeared on CBS’s 60 Minutes to warn the U.S. market of what lawmakers perceived as the Huawei threat.

“If I were an American company today… and you are looking at Huawei, I would find another vendor if you care about your intellectual property, if you care about your consumers’ privacy, and you care about the national security of the United States of America,” Rogers said.

The House admonition was followed with reports that the Obama administration had led its own security review of Huawei equipment and business practices and found no evidence of espionage or deliberate cybersecurity threats or practices that would undermine the national security of the United States, Reuters news service reported. The White House has since denied it authorized any such report and disavowed the conclusion that Huawei had been exonerated.

The damage was done, however. A poll conducted by Channelnomics and The 2112 Group after the House report was made public found that U.S. solution providers overwhelmingly felt the U.S. assertions against Huawei would dampen sales and marketability of the company’s products, and they would be less likely to work with companies labeled as a national security threat.

European countries, meanwhile, continue to embrace Huawei, with officials in the U.K. in mid-October announcing the vendor’s $2 billion investment in a new regional headquarters and the plans to expand in the British Isles. And indeed there are dozens of foreign technology companies who supply the underpinnings of critical infrastructure with whom U.S. companies and the U.S. government have no problem at all.

William Plummer, vice president for external affairs at Huawei in Washington, told Channelnomics the House report was a “political distraction” and that the intelligence committee “seems focused on the acts of other states.

“To the extent that there are issues between states, they should be managed through appropriate diplomatic or other channels, not by holding hostage an independent, world-respected and trusted company,” Plummer said.

  • Tweet  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Facebook  
  • Google plus  
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to  
More on Channel Business
man-family-office-suit

New Cyberoam UTM targets remote workers

Security device aimed at small offices

hands-dollars

What you give is what you get: Symantec partner program post-split

Firm's impending split may leave some partners better off, but what about the others?

contract-drafting

RackWare signs up to NetApp partner program

Firm integrating technology with NetApp and IBM

data-quality

Value over volume, RackWare says of expanded channel partner program

Aim is to have the right coverage with close relationships, VP says

Visitor comments
Add comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
In-depth
hands-dollars

What you give is what you get: Symantec partner program post-split

Firm's impending split may leave some partners better off, but what about the others?

steps55

Time to step up: vendors missing the mark on IoT

A new study by AVG Technologies finds that SMBs and MSPs see tremendous potential in the Internet of Things as a driver of business growth – provided IT vendors and solution providers step up their game

wael-aggan-cloudmask

Vendor Q&A Series: Wael Aggan, CloudMask

The latest vendor executive to sit in the Channelnomics hotseat is Wael Aggan, CEO of CloudMask

healthy-heart

Microsoft getting healthy, thanks to consumers

Is it time to take the software giant off the watch list of tech companies in distress, at least on the consumer side, asks Larry Walsh